
Call this an Afternoon Hangover after a Friday beer lunch (man, I miss those)...
Obviously this is spurred by Modern Warfare 2's release next week, but it's a question applicable to any game with multiplayer. When you boot up a new game for the first time, what takes priority...playing through the story, or hopping online and getting a jump on your stats?
Personally, I can't do anything multiplayer until I play through a significant portion of the single-player campaign. This is for a couple of reasons:
- I'm a little sensitive when it comes to story spoilers, even in bad games. (And bad movies, and bad books, and bad TV...) Better to get through the experience myself before co-workers casually mention that character/event/location either died/happened/exploded. I've heard enough chatter about MW2 already, and the game's not even out yet.
- I need to get familiar with the basic control scheme of a game before I embarass myself in the public arena. Movement speed, aiming sensitivity, weapon familiarity...I need to know the particulars of all of these things so I can properly blame them for finishing second-to-last in the round.
- I always forget to recharge my headset, so I need a few hours alone anyway.
So this Tuesday...perks or plot? Render thine opinions!














You know how the Wii is positioned as a game system that sells units by offering less than its competitors but having a user-friendly gimmick? Nintendo may be "correcting course" a bit and offering some of the services users of the other two big game systems take for granted.
Most of the time its single player first with the exception of battlefield games in which i dont even bother with the single player because all i think about when playing sp is how much id rather be playing multi.
About the post above about the chat with IW. IW can go die in a fire for all i care. They lost alot of good fans by doing such a #$@^ move.
Posted: 1 hour 4 mins ago by Purplehasiso
Leave a Comment »