The 2009 Thanksgiving Turkey Game Pardon

25 Comments Posted November 25, 2009 - By Andrew Pfister

The 2009 Thanksgiving Turkey Game Pardon

Somewhere in a secret underground bunker in Washington, D.C., key members of the Department of Justice (Poultry Division) have convened to decide which of our nation's millions of turkeys is to receive the annual White House pardon. In that same spirit of forgiveness, we're going to do the same with one of this year's biggest digital turkeys. This absolutely does not mean that we're forgiving the "winner's" myriad flaws or that we're doing an about-face and recommending it for purchase, just that we can kind of see where they were coming from with it...even if the end result was the equivalent to dropping a frozen turkey in a deep fryer. That is to say: a lesson to be learned by everybody.

This year's candidates are...

WET

You aren't truly terrible, WET. You've got stylish flair, tolerable controls, and Malcom MacDowell, Eliza Dushku, and Alan Cumming. But still selling for $59.99 after mediocre reviews and the promise of superior hack-and-slash games on the horizon? It's like paying more than 50 cents per pound for an off-brand bird. That kind of arrogance can cost you your life...and it just did.

WET

Tony Hawk: Ride

We'll admit it: We were the ones clamoring for a reboot of the Tony Hawk franchise for the past few years. But an overpriced peripheral that can be activated by random passers-by and a game that appears to be completely dumbed-down isn't exactly what we had in mind. We'd send you to the kids table, but you'd still have trouble following the conversation.

Tony Hawk Ride

G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra

To quote Matt Keil's review: "This is largely due to the fact that the base gameplay is essentially Contra post-debilitating brain injury. For the most part, stages can be cleared by simply holding down the right trigger and waiting for everything to die." Sorry, Joe: you're too dumb to live.

G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra (360)

This is where it gets interesting. A fight nearly broke out over the internal e-mail thread discussing these final three candidates, and which one was the worst in the best way.

Darkest of Days

It's always a shame when a developer wastes a golden concept by building truly awful game around it. Such is the case with Darkest of Days, which featured a time-traveling soldier who must restore the proper time line by fighting in the world's most famous wars. Unfortunately, it also featured a litany of debilitating problems that nearly rendered it unplayable. We never liked dark meat, anyway.

Darkest of Days

Wanted: Weapons of Fate

Similar to WET, Wanted: Weapons of Fate has got some style...but not enough to compensate for its 4-hour running time and full price tag. It probably would have been better served as a download-only game, but even then, the near lack of challenge still wouldn't justify the investment.

Wanted: Weapons of Fate

Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard

Darkest of Days shares the award for "best concept, worst execution" with this spoof of the video game industry's most treasured cliches. They got the humor part down -- having Arrested Development/30 Rock's Will Arnett helps -- but whiffed on pretty much everything else. The joke is stretched too thinly over repetitive, bland gameplay and mechanics that were poorly executed.

Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard

HOWEVER! The idea is still a really good one, as there are too few games that are genuinely funny and self-aware. That there's a sequel coming in the form of Blood Bath and Beyond hopefully means the developer has learned some lessons about actual game design...you know, the real reasons we play these things in the first place.

So congratulations, Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard...you are this year's best terrible game! You are hereby pardoned for crimes against interactive entertainment, and may continue your existence in equal measure of hope and shame.

Tags: Videogames

Comments

Oldest First

Displaying 1–20 of 25

12 2

Mister_Sr

Save either WANTED or WET slaughter the rest

Posted: November 25, 2009 6:03 AM | Reply | Report

+3 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
TheSiwentKiwwah

I kind of liked WET--it was really fun. It was like a Quentin Tarantino game, with the film grain and music and such. I kind of reminded me of other 70s/80s media nods, though. The atmostphere, clothes, vehicles, and enviroments look true to the decade, then they'll bust out some technology that is less than 10 years old...

Posted: November 25, 2009 6:05 AM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
sjue316

Wet is the only good game on this list. Granted its a short game and we can't get around that. Yes, the controls are wonkie in some places, but we deal. The fact that this game got mediocre review should save it alone. I bought it and I like it alot, but the fact that its $60 bucks kind of detours most people. However, $60 bucks doesn't stop people from buying a game. Look at Halo ODST, its a $60 game and takes about the same amount of play through as WET. The only difference is that Halo ODST has a multiplayer component and the firefight option for replay value. Wet has points mode and boneyard challenges. Not much to compete with vs. ODST, but at least it attempts to give the game some replay value. Add that to the games already challenging difficulty and Wet actually has hidden replay value, which is more than I could say for some of these games. My short opinion save WET, burn the rest.

Posted: November 25, 2009 7:20 AM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
tragedy93

I have to agree with a pardon for Eat Lead- for all the same reasons yada yada. I was pretty excited when this game first showed up on my radar, but after reading a few article I quickly realized this one wasn't even worth renting...great concept tho'

Posted: November 25, 2009 7:26 AM | Reply | Report

+2 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
aztecyankee

I would save Wanted for only one reason ...I'm a confessed Achievement Whore!! I would pardon Wet just cause of Dushku sultry voice!!!

Posted: November 25, 2009 7:49 AM | Reply | Report

0 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
Hoss70

I thought WET was a great game. I beat it in fact, even though, yes, the controls were wonky alot of the time. But it was still a good mindless romp for me. As for the rest of the games....not so much.

Posted: November 25, 2009 8:19 AM | Reply | Report

0 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
celestialove03

Pardon Eat Lead

Posted: November 25, 2009 8:22 AM | Reply | Report

0 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
DaFrEaKzO

Is WET really as bad as people are leading me to believe? I have the demo and enjoy playing it occasionally.

Posted: November 25, 2009 8:31 AM | Reply | Report

+2 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
rjs927

I rented WET and I really liked it. It had its flaws but is great as a rental. Of course when I was done with it I never really had any interest in playing it again so I was glad I didn't buy it. So, if you are interested, rent it. If you REALLY like it then go ahead and buy it, but I doubt you will.

Posted: November 25, 2009 8:40 AM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
dogsanty

me to i play the demo. ok -of a rental, but of a buy-mmm not.

Posted: November 25, 2009 9:13 AM | Reply | Report

0 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
GreedyMcNasty

Andrew come on man. You are just making me look at all the bad games I played this past year. Some of them I thought were pretty good. Wet noooooooooooooooooooo! Matt Hazard YES! When it comes down to games I like to dabble in a little of this and a little of that, I will always be a fighting game fan first.

Play a hour or two of wet then put in a 6 hour sit down of street fighter 4. Happy thanks giving!

Posted: November 25, 2009 9:50 AM | Reply | Report

+2 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
rosie314

Wet needs to be saved

Posted: November 25, 2009 12:09 PM | Reply | Report

0 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
Juicelee

there is hope for wet if they fixed the controls and tweaked the physics a bit you'd have a game that would be a surefire contender

Posted: November 25, 2009 12:24 PM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
gravy666

Eat Lead sounds funny to me. For some reason I have the urge to rent it regardless of the horrible reviews it got just so I can get a few laughs.

Posted: November 25, 2009 2:08 PM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
fpsjoe

hmm apperently I was the only one who actually liked Darkest of Days. Yes some of the levels were frustraiting (zeppelin level) but I feel that this will be an undergroud classic someday. I'll hold on to my copy no matter what people say about it I still enjoyed it.

Posted: November 25, 2009 2:31 PM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
SavageHunter

"Its a game." - Gus Sorola when talking about WET

Posted: November 25, 2009 2:37 PM | Reply | Report

0 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
Warrior567

when i heard the gi joe review i busted out laughing

Posted: November 25, 2009 2:57 PM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
Keine_Lust

WET not that bad of a game.

Posted: November 25, 2009 3:06 PM | Reply | Report

0 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
Kerbe360

I thought WET was a fun game to play... though it took a little getting use to. I agree with the majority here. Save WET... burn the rest. I got a special spot reserved for GI JOE in Donte's Inferno.

Posted: November 25, 2009 4:25 PM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies
SmashBro722

WET was pretty cool, and you know it. Still, I played the Darkest of Days demo, and it wasn't half bad. In a way, I think it was the best \"historical\" game I've ever played, but all I can say is that something about historical games equals disaster. But, anything else really was a major disappointment. Why Eat Lead, anyway?

Posted: November 26, 2009 1:29 AM | Reply | Report

+1 thumbs up thumbs down

0 Replies