
Greetings, and Happy Labor Day!
It appears that the Marvel Movie Universe just grew (or shrunk, depending on your point of view.) According to a recent blurb by Entertainment Weekly, the long-awaited superhero solo film starring Henry Pym or Ant-Man (among other aliases), perhaps the most unsung of the Avengers founding members, will indeed be moving forward. Shaun of the Dead director, Edgar Wright has already been attached to direct. (Which has been known for some time, now.) The statement by EW that has created this firestorm across the news sites read: "Pixar is said to already be eyeballing an Ant-Man movie."
"Woah, woah, WOAH, did we just read Pixar?!"
Yes, you did. This, perhaps, is the first real "post-Marvel buyout" bit of news. However, don't let Disney/Pixar's production involvement fool you, as it seems unlikely that Disney and Pixar would go down the whole Incredibles route with a strictly animated feature. Seeing as this Ant-Man film is slated for 2012, around the time that hype-machine behind The Avengers will be in full effect, it would be inconceivable that this film would deviate from the live-action format shared by its peer films, which are also tied into The Avengers. This will likely be a live-action film, which will showcase Pixar's digital animation for Ant-Man's various size transformations. (This seems to be the general consensus among news writers.)
Meanwhile, it still has not been confirmed as to WHERE we will see the debut of Henry Pym in the Marvel Movie Universe. There was speculation that Pym and future/ex wife Janet van Dyne (aka The Wasp) would have a low-key appearance as scientists of some kind in Iron Man 2. (Which, considering the assembling of the Avengers has already been teased in IM1, would make sense.) However, there have also been contrary rumors implying that even up to The Avengers film itself, we would go "Pym-less." If such a notion were to be true, it may lend credence to the idea that Pixar was moving forward with a strictly animated feature. (I sincerely hope that is NOT the case.)
Regardless of whatever format in which this film will ultimately be, most indicators (confirmed by ScreenRant's informative write-up) seem to make clear that this will be a less serious kind of superhero film. In essence, it will be a comedy, but not a genre parody like Edgar Wright's previous films. Also, the solo film will not likely feature any other Avengers members. (Although the presence of The Wasp seems critical, so it will be interesting to see how that holds.)
While EW's "eyeballing" comment may have been a playful pun whose punchline we do not yet know, it also has a ring of truth. This one has been in the developmental rumor mills for a while at this point, and to be honest, up until now, I really didn't see it happening at all. Now that it seems to be a reality, I'm pretty excited for a live-action Ant-Man.
I actually think Henry Pym does not get enough credit for being a genuinely fascinating character. He essentially utilized his own genius and used science to create his own superpowers. (As opposed to the typical "radioactive accident" origins of the 60's.) As Ant-Man, he can shrink himself and sabotage you from the inside, or as Giant-Man or Goliath, he can just grow and smash you like a bug. (An ant?) His many personae have created a multiple personality disorder that sometimes resonates when he cavorts as his cocky alter-ego, Yellowjacket. There are just so many facets to work with, here. This could be a genuinely cool film with enough comic relief to make it a fun experience for a wide variety of moviegoers. (Which equals big money, btw.)



Comments
Displaying 1–20 of 21
122
Tadhg
well, they were quick on using the new licenses they gained.
Deaf_Gamer
i would love to see Ant-man goes as sort of comedy-action with
comedy being a real good one. not the slapstick-dumb type
a good comedy-action movie.
it possible for ant-man
gambit1023
It's great to see pixar getting involved with a live action film(if it's true). After all that is how Pixar was originally conceived. Can you imagine the possibilities if Pixar was involved in the special effects for all marvel based properties from here on in. It could easily take down the juggernaut that is ILM.lol
N8R
As much as I'm sincerely and truly sure this flick will look great, be a foundation of technological accomplishment, and be appealing to the majority of movie-goers... COME ON!
The Hank Pym story was a foundation for The Avengers. The Avengers is a foundation for the ENTIRE Marvel Universe. I don't want to see classic comic villains look like they belonged in Up or Toy Story. I loved the Incredibles maybe even more than any other Pixar movie but that was an original story... this is burrowing in on sacrilege and blasphemy.
I love Pixar... but they should stick to their originals or else they've sold out like most other studios. All the hope I had for Disney to actually do something positive with this acquisition is now crushed.
To those unfamiliar with the original Hank Pym... I truly hope you enjoy this movie while aiding future generations to disregard the ACTUAL origin of the Avengers and foundation to the Marvel Universe with it's brand new look and feel.
The deed is done, it can't be stopped now.
Haylo34
as long as its pg 13 and not CGI, im good
neosk
Boooo is that the only news for today??? theres no news today except for this one.
QUIK_LA_420
okay?? whats next? WORM WOMAN
ddf
ant man is giant man
ddf
but on the avengers he get big he dnt use ant
darkking16
y does diney hate us
Raiku1991
why dont we have any news about the awesome ps3 sales over in japan?
ProudFilipino
so begins Disneys take into Marvel I hope they dont screw this up I love all the Pixar movies but Pixar doing Antman? really? I dont mind it being a cartoon CGI film but I would greatly prefer it to be a live aciton movie
brsterkens
thats cool
DBJAY
If Pixar is interested, then it's 3 years or more away. Toy Story 3 in 2010, Newt in 2011, and Cars 2 in 2012 (no doubt scheduled then because of Carsland in Disney's California Adventure theme park.)
Oinkness
Wow, if Ant Man looks anything like Jeff Goldblum when he turns into the Fly, I really don't want to see that. I bet the transformation is really gross.
Curare
Whit the load of Marvel movies being dog crap, with the exception of Iron Man, This could be a good thing. Pixar is a quality studio and they have the money to actually finish the movies. I actually hope all the rest of the Marvel movies are done at Pixar.
drh1975
Hank Pym is the most underrated member of the Avengers. Why shouldn't he get his own movie?
JordanFromJersey
I would just like to point out that the Ant-Man pictured in the article is actually Eric O'Grady/G.I.Ant-Man, not Hank Pym/Ant-Man/Giant-Man/Goliath/ Yellowjacket.
With that said though, I would much rather like to see a movie about the O'Grady Ant-Man. His 12 issue series was awesome and hilarious. But if anyone could make me enjoy a movie about Pym I'm sure it would be either Pixar or Wright.
-JFJ
ABXPuPpeT
yah disney ANT MAN is worth the 4 billion buy out of Marvel
DailyPOP
Don't forget the John Carter movie that Pixar is working on.
Until an official statement comes from Pixar or Disney I'm just not buying that they are working on any Marvel properties.
In fact, Disney has stated when they purchased Marvel Entertainment that they are not interested in interfering with any ME projects already in production.
ME President Kevin Feige has also stated that as of two weeks ago Edgar Wright is still attached to the Ant Man movie and that it will come out after the Avengers film.
Reading between the lines of what Feige said that the movie will be as funny as fans expect, I think this will be an adaptation of the Irredeemable Ant Man by Robert Kirkman and Phil Hester (Eric O'Grady referenced by JordanFromJersey above) rather than the classic Hank Pym version.
More here: http://dailypop.wordpress.com/ 2009/09/03/all-together-now-th e-mighty-marvel-movie-manifest o/
Displaying 1–20 of 21
122
Add a Comment