With futuristic weapons, a shield-generator armored suit, and open fields of battle that have numerous and varied objectives, TimeGate's first-person shooter Section 8 plays like a sci-fi version of Battlefield. Or a Wookie-free version of Star Wars: Battlefront.
The Pros
- Is like 'Battlefield'...In Space. Soft of.
- Running boost gets you to the fight quick.
- Tons of weapon options.
The Cons
- Weak campaign mode.
- There's little about the game that you can't get from better titles.
With futuristic weapons, a shield-generator armored suit, and open fields of battle that have numerous and varied objectives, TimeGate’s first-person shooter Section 8 plays like a sci-fi version of Battlefield. Or a Wookie-free version of Star Wars: Battlefront.
But while being like Battlefield isn't a bad thing unto itself (just consider how much you like the Battlefront games), being so Battlefield-esque is kind of a problem for Section 8 because the impending release of a new Battlefield and a number of other upcoming similar games make Section 8 kind of moot.

For The Good Of The Outfit
In Section 8, you play as, well, there's no way around this: you play as an orbital drop trooper. You drop into big battlefields, using your air brakes to slightly manipulate where you're going to land, then you shoot anyone who gets in the way of your objectives, which include capturing points, destroying things, and grabbing other people's stuff.
To help you do this, you have some futuristic weapons that come equipped with an advanced auto-targeting function that lets you hit a button to lock on to your target. But unlike most, this one will actually stay locked onto your enemy, so long as you're aimed in their general direction.
Defending you from other people's futuristic weapons is your armor suit's regenerating shield, as well as a speed boost ability that kicks in when you hold down the run button. It even switches to a third-person perspective so you can admire how good your butt looks as you run. Unfortunately, the suit's brakes need replacing. They're slow to respond, which sometimes means you run straight into the middle of a fire fight without even trying.
Well, unless you run into something. Then you'll stop real quick.
You also have a jet pack, which has prompted some people to compare this game to Tribes. Except that unlike in Tribes, in which players jet-packed around like Jango Fett trying to show off in front of his kid, in Section 8 people usually just use it to jump. Since, for some odd reason, there is no jump button.
Divided We Stand
The main mode of this game, of course, is the online multiplayer one they've dubbed “Conquest.” In it, two teams have to complete a series of objectives - such as capturing enemy bases, destroying enemy defenses, stealing enemy intel - that are placed around the map. Doing any of these, or just killing your enemy, and your team gets points; get to the point goal and you win.
Assisting you in your victory is the ability to call for a weapons drop, or a turret drop, vehicle drop, or a new armor suit drop. You can even, after you die, drop back in near your squad, or opt for the “free spawn” approach, which lets you decide where on the map you want to land. There are also the usual options to choose from: bots vs. no bots, difficulty, and which of the eighteen included map you'd like your guts splattered across. Granted, ten of the maps are variations or sections of other/larger maps, but still, eighteen maps at launch is more than most games gets in a lifetime.

Sometimes You Hear The Bullet
Besides “Conquest,” Section 8 has a story-driven single-player mode called “Corde's Story.” But like the story mode in every online-leaning game, “Corde's” really feels like a training mode, only longer, since it plays exactly like a multiplayer game except that it's just you and some bots, you do the objectives in a specific order, and there's cut scenes.
However, there's a major flaw in having the online shooter elements in the story mode. At the end of the first mission, for example, you face off against a guy with an even bigger armor suit. Unfortunately for you, your suit's regenerating shield doesn't seem to work that well, and you're not that healthy. As a result, Section 8 has a rather high mortality rate; you die more often than Bill Maher at a Catholic League staff meeting.
Because of this issue, bosses make rather quick work of you. Which would be frustrating, were it not for the fact that you never really die; you just respawn and drop back into the battle already in progress. So you can just keep attacking him, dying over and over again in the process, until you wear him down. Which robs these battles of any challenge.
This mode's role as a training program is also made moot by the inclusion of another mode called “Instant Action” in which you actually play “Conquest” against bots. It even features all the options you find in “Conquest,” as well as one that lets you decide the makeup of the teams. Has reading Leopold Von Sacher-Masoch's “Venus In Furs” lately made you feel a bit masochistic? Play “Super Swarm,” which is described as “Humans And Bots Vs. Bots On Very Uneven Teams” or the self-explanatory “One Man Army.”

Goodbye, Farewell, And Amen
For what it's trying to be, Section 8 does a decent job. The controls are solid, there's plenty of options, the levels are varied and numerous, and while the graphics aren't mind-blowing or especially original looking, they don't get in the way of the action. And while other games do this type of game better, fans of this subgenre will still have fun with it.
No, the biggest problem isn't with “what” Section 8 is or isn't, but “when.” Within months of the game’s launch window, there will be a ton of games that mine similar or even the same territory, and do it better: Halo 3: ODST, Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and Star Wars: Battlefront: Elite Squadron. Even without them, though, this game's timing would be bad, since people are still playing Halo 3 and Gears Of War 2 online every night.
In other words, while you might like Section 8, you don't really need it, now do you?







Comments
Displaying 1–20 of 34
122
badgarok725
YES. I'm not the only one that found it similar to Star Wars Battlefront. There is a jump button though. Just tap the button genius, it doesn't use any of the jetpack fuel or whatever. This game sort of looks like an average game during the age of great games, and games no one plays online.
One problem, does anyone else find it weird that you, inside of a large battle suit, can get into an even BIGGER battle mech? Just a bit weird
OneBadMofo
wow a 2 i thought this game was gonna be actually pretty good but i knew it wouldnt be great
jellyfish2013
I played the demo and I totally agree with them. I didn't like this game at all.
aPoLiS117
the review sounded like a 3 to me, and the main reason seemed to be cause there are better games coming but whatever.. if i want to play a game like this I'll put my Y2K hat on, and jump back to the 90s so i can play some tribes. at least that game was was good, AND ORIGINAL!
Akaelik
I cannot say how sorely disappointed I was when I tried the demo after I saw the trailer a few months back. After I saw the trailer I was thinking there was a very plausible chance for a game to make as big of a hit as any of the halo series did. I eagerly waited for the game, yet as i dropped into the demo I began to feel misled... this was no epic game... rather another shallow attempt at something that had been done before... Tribes.
AgentMark
I knew from the very beginning this was going to be a sour game. Even from the first time I saw the X Play Preview.
ProudFilipino ShowHide(5 Replies)
Another crappy ezclusive that came out this year for the 360 others include Darkest of Days and Champions Online
smighenns
wow i thought this game was gonna be good
SpooderW
Wow. I was so looking forward to this game and yet I couldn't see how it could possibly come out well. Damn me for being right!
Pops007h
I don't see how this game got a 2. The game AT LEAST a 3. The point of this game was for the multiplayer which is really fun and works well. The game is great and is a great sub if you are waiting for CoD: MWF2 and Halo ODST. 2/5 is a bad review for this game. It deserved better.
Donkerwilly
Game play is terrible and there is so many problems with the online play. The game is a good idea but they definitely needed to work more on this game to make it better
hathur
Paul Semel, this response is for you regarding your review..
I played the demo and agree the game isn't very fun and deserves about a score of 2... but the your logic and reasoning for giving it a 2 is horribly flawed. I cannot believe that this is the criteria on which G4 staff review games upon. You basically pegged the game down because there are other games coming out in the next few months that are very similar in style...
You can't be serious and tell me that's a legitimate reason to score a game low... almost all games today's are either FPS, MMO, RPG, etc... to rank this game poorly just because it's another FPS? Are you telling me G4 staff is automatically assuming that the releases coming out in the next few months are guaranteed beyond certainty to be better than this game? You write your reviews BEFORE you play the game, is that it?
Granted, yes the new COD game and HALO ODST will in all likelihood be good games... but as "impartial" reviewers you can't just pre-judge those games to be great before they're released and then proceed to peg this game poorly just because those games that are upcoming are "probably better". How do you know this for certainty or fact? What if they have glaring problems at release that nobody knows about until they come out?
The point is you should have rated this game on it's OWN merits or FAULTS... not on the merits or faults of upcoming or current games.
Your review, as it stands, was beyond useless. Please in the future tell us what works well in a game, what doesn't and just shutup about other games... reserve comparisons to giving your readers an idea as to what type of game it may be similar to, but don't use comparisons to other games as the justification whether or not the game is good.
Review based on controls, fun factor, visuals, audio, gameplay etc etc.
shintho1
THEY TYPOED!!!!!!
In the "pros" box at the top the said "Soft of" it should be sort of
theg90
First thing I thought of when I got the demo:
Tribes
THis is one of my favorite FPS's at the moment
Crankr
Who doesn't like looking at their own ass?
ddc2494
Looked alot like Halo got Star Wars: Battlefield pregnent then they drunk, and did drugs and had a baby with every disease.. Section 8 is that baby.
Yatzee1000
I want Tribes 4
lltheFacell
Ha, i called it
tvj2004
No wonder this PS3 version was cancelled. They could even get the PC/360 version down. Oh well lets move past the mediocrity this Fall, and head towards the greatness:
Halo: Recon (Sorry Bungie, I like your original title better)
Uncharted 2
Dragon Age
Borderlands
Brutal Legend
Demon's Souls
Tekken 6
Ratchet & Clank
and GT5 (hopefully)
SavageHunter
Battlefield was used five times in that review. Thats weak.
Displaying 1–20 of 34
122
Add a Comment