More WWII action! Hooray! And X-Play's got the review, of course. This one's called Red Orchestra, and it's for your PC.
The Pros
- Ultra-realistic, multiplayer WWII combat
The Cons
- High learning curve
- Kooky physics
- Bad bot A.I.
Dissing Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45 for not being what we like in a game is like kicking the crap out of some kid’s sand castle at the beach. He worked really hard at it, so what kind of angry pathetic critic would take it upon himself to destroy it?
Let’s be honest, Red Orchestra just isn’t our particular cup of tea. Hard core realism is something to be admired, but not necessarily enjoyed. We could take the time to understand the complex bullet physics in the game, or perhaps pick up some books on early 20th century Russian combines to learn how many rounds their clips hold, but we would rather just shoot people in the face. Really.
Better Off Dead
Red Orchestra tries to recreate the technical aspects or WWII combat – especially as they played out between the Germans in Russians on the Eastern front – down to the dirty details of war by leaving out a lot of the clichés and abstractions that we’ve become so used to in games. There is no crosshair, you must aim your weapon through the iron sights and compensate for recoil. There’s no little indicator telling you how many bullets are left in your clip, you have to mentally keep track. And if you’re shot, you’re shot, in fact you’re probably already dead. There are no health packs.
We appreciate that that was what war was really like, but that’s why they say war is hell; games are supposed to be fun. But if you want to not enjoy yourself playing a game as much as you would in real combat – minus the trenchfoot and headwounds – then Red Orchestra may be for you.
To compare it to other games, Red Orchestra fits rather uncomfortably in the Battlefield mold. You choose between different character classes, each with their own historically accurate weapon and equipment loadouts. Vehicles are a crucial part of a game, but of course the realism demands that you can’t just drive a tank and shoot all the guns by yourself, so you’ll have to hope that the people you’re playing with know what they’re doing. The bots are a little too dumb to be of any use.
The Little Game That Could
The story behind the game is a charming one though. Originally created by independent developers as a total conversion mod for the Unreal Tournament engine, Red Orchestra won a prestigious award for mod makers given out by nVidia and Epic Games (developers of the Unreal engine) which resulted in its being picked up for distribution over Valve’s game download system, Steam. The devs are very deserving of huge kudos for their efforts, but the end product really only appeals to a niche market of gamers.
The biggest problem with Red Orchestra though is what they choose to focus their realism efforts on. Sure, the weapons and ballistics are right out of a textbook; but the wide-open levels themselves, and the capture point style gameplay reveal the game’s true roots as an Unreal mod. If you want to recreate a realistic experience, it has to cover every aspect of the game, not just some of the specific mechanics. Other games like Call of Duty may be far less realistic, but succeed much more greatly in creating an immersive experience. And when it comes down to it, that’s more important to transmitting the real sense of being there than weapons that are impossible to shoot.
If effort counts, then Red Orchestra is not a bad game, and it might even be a very good one. But playing games is about having experiences, and the experience of playing Red Orchestra will leave 95% of the gaming community out in the cold. That other 5% will have the time of their lives though.
Article By: Tom Price
Video Produced By: Michael Benson





19 Comments
Duffman42
"I also disagree with this review. It doesn't appeal to the mainstream gamer, true, but it does one hell of a good job of what it set out to do: provide an intense realistic experience."
Dinnj
"Every person that I know who has bought this game has loved it. This game is as complex as you want to make it.
Firslty, the bots are not meant to have spectacular AI. This is only for people who are too anti-social to play a game with other players. On the "Difficulty", again, if you choose to count the bullets left in your mag, go ahead, and as for just wanting to shoot somebody in the face, well. YOU DONT -NEED- TO COUNT THE BULLETS IN YOUR MAG. It's THAT simple, when you click your mouse, and your gun doesn't fire, you need to reload ^)^. And for the vehicles? Yes, you can operate an entire tank by yourself have you have an IQ higher than 80. You simply change to driver, move to position, and change to gunner. Getting kills is easier, i've let my nephew, (Aged 3) Mess about, told him to move the mouse around untill he saw a man, and then hold on the clicker, surely enough, he can kill a good few enemies.
Rubbish review, clearly rushed, little pros exposed.
You suck."
palestiniankid
"yea that was BS, you guys played against the bots and you got your ass kicked so you hated it, could'nt handle the realism. I would give the game 4 outta 5"
bleedingbullet792
"Wowwww, you have got to be such a freaking panzie to complain about no cross hairs or no icon for how many bullets are left in your gun.
"Oh it takes forever to reload wahhhh" Shut up! since when does reloading happen instantly???
The people who made this review are probably still playing cheesy arcade style games like 007 or Halo.
This was by far the most horrible, inaccurate, piece of crap review i have ever seen in my life. Then again a lot of G4's reviews are garbage any way."
bleedingbullet792
"woooooooowwww TOM u are a freaking retard. First of all the bots in this game have been WORLD-WIDE recognized as some of the smartest A.I. TO DATE!
the only time a bot is some what annoying is when a human player is in a tank with a bot when the A.I. LEVEL IS LOW.
AND NO! u do not die in only 2 shots. It depends on the weapon used, where you were shot at, and the bullets used. Which in turn gives you a rather LARGE survival curve, especially in online play.
P.S.
TOM remember if u wanna do it properly u slide the razor down you arm not across the street."
bleedingbullet792
"If anyone wants to play online with me then AIM me at
REAVERBLADE41
my RO screen Name is also BleedingBullet
see you REAL gamers online ^_^"
th3wraith
"wow tom, that was one dumb review, everybody i know who has red orchestra loves it. The game is as complex as you want to make it, I play just about anything, and i have got to give a lot of props to tripwire for breaking the mold. you bash tw for innovation, you just want gaming to stay the same as it has been, by suppressing the innovation, that way things stay the same and you dont have to learn any new gameplay dynamics. hey tom, i got an idea, go play red orchestra for at least 5 hours before you have the nads to review it, that way you at least know what you are talking about.
anyone who wants to play a game with me, my xfire is usmflyboy"
PoFoks
"This review is BS. I like the game, I am not a realism nazi or anthing like that. (Hell, I love TF2) This reveiw is bias and give a bad name to Tripwire studios. It does not include the other PROS, like the developers (Tripwire studios)actually listen to the fanbase (I don't know any other company that does that). They release free updates (looks at BF2.) This game is ment to be hard for a reason, to reward players on a job well done. I played the weekend trial before buying this game, and it doesn't really have a "Steep" learning curve. All you have to do is click a button and shoot. This review should be done by PRO reviewers, not this trash reviewing that is cut to only 3 mins long. Hell you gave Call of Duty 3 a 3/5, this game is deffinatly better then Call of Duty 3. It should be given more credit for trying something no one else has ever tried before, a great WWII FPS in the eastern front. I would love to have this game re-viseted."
pvtsoupie
"ok this review is crap"
pvtsoupie
"wow you're review suck tom"
Comments 1–10 of 19
122
Add a Comment